Morphic Resonance

Evolution as Echoes

Before we start down this path, we may want to check in about dogma.

Material Scientism
thus far

has failed to explain
many of the basic phenomena we experience.

Mainstream Science can be stymied by a two-year-old πŸ§’

Where do forms come from?

How do things take shape?

πŸ”ͺπŸͺ± Why does a worm halved make two worms? πŸͺ±πŸͺ±

How is babby formed?

How do we get pargnart?

The hypothesis of formative causation offers sensible, predictable, testable answers to all of the above. In short, the answer is morphic resonance.

What is morphic resonance?

πŸ₯œ In a nutshell

formative causation
and morphic resonance
tell us that:

Forms emerge from
past related forms 🧬

As forms emerge more,
they are more likely to emerge.

πŸ€• When a form is disturbed,
it tends to return

🌑️ for homeostasis is
the goal of life

Evolution as
echoes self-refining.

Here we may diverge from Sheldrake’s work.

Satchitananda propels us out of the ignorant void of all possibilities to pursue a vector of continuous self-improvement into the infinite interwoven dimensions of the realm of manifestation, each quality co-creating its opposite

For every
yin a yang☯️

The rest is just echoes 🀯

from the big bang of that original intent to love ourself and play all the ways🎲